lyt.
EN DA

Get better at product development, one meeting at a time.

Lyt sits in, whether it is a steering group meeting, a customer meeting or a user interview, and tells you what you could do better.

Download on the App Store Download for Mac Download for Windows

7 days free, then from DKK 99 a month.

Book a demo, 20 minutes online →

Nobody tells you what you did well, and what you could do better.

Lyt does.

Hit record before the meeting.

No prep.

The Lyt app icon

Concrete feedback, quoted from your own meeting.

01 Hit record→ 02 Hold your meeting→ 03 The feedback lands

The window is a demo of the app, click around in it.

This is what the feedback looks like on your iPhone.

Lyt on iPhone: the feedback screen with your next practice and the moments in the meeting you could have handled differently
Discovery meeting on the onboarding flow Delete
Feedback

Discovery meeting on the onboarding flow

27 May · 14.30  ·  2 speakers  ·  English
The report in four lines
Your exerciseHalf way. You said the source twice, lost it the third time.
Next practiceWhen you say “we have data on that”, then say the source and the number in the same sentence.
Could have doneData without a source  ·  Solution before the problem was closed
Do againProblem before solution  ·  Let the designer conclude
Your exercise

Half way. You said the source twice, lost it the third time.

Different from last time: back then you never mentioned a number. Today “12 tickets” [08:40] came up twice. The third time [31:05] it became “we have data on that”, and that claim carried the rest of the decision.

When you say “we have data on that”, then say the source and the number in the same sentence.

3rd meeting with it. Replaces “Open with the problem, not the solution”, which you kept for 4 meetings. ChangeWrite your ownTurn off
What you could have done2
Data without a source“We have data on that”31:05Nobody asked for the source, and the claim carried the rest of the decision.Instead: “12 tickets and three interviews point to X.”
Solution before the problem was closed“Shouldn't we just test both variants?”22:10The designer hadn't yet said what the problem was. You tested solutions on an open question.Instead: “What is the most important thing we don't know about the user yet?”
Do it again2problem before solution · let the designer conclude
Problem before solution“Let's stay on the problem for a moment”01:20The room stayed on the problem for the first eight minutes, and the designer brought up the drop-off at step two herself.
Let the designer conclude“What do you see when you look at step two?”14:50She phrased the hypothesis herself, and it held for the rest of the meeting.
Your focus2Discovery · Leadership
Discovery · Claim without evidence“We have data on that” went unchallenged and became the basis for testing two variants.
Leadership · Opened on the problemYou kept the room on the problem for the first eight minutes before solutions came up.
Next time2

Which 12 tickets, and what exactly did the three interviews say?

What would make you drop both variants?

Reference

Teresa Torres separates what you know from what you assume. “We have data on that” belongs in the second column until the source is said out loud.

Read more
EssayTeresa Torres: Continuous Discovery HabitsDiscovery as a muscle, not a phase: how teams build weekly habits of customer contact.EssayPlaybook · Layer 3: Skills & practiceFewer skills than before, deeper than before. Layer 3 is about the craft: what each person has to be good at when roles and processes no longer set you apart.
Background
Summarywhat the meeting was about

45 minutes on the onboarding flow with a designer. You landed on testing two variants, and you made the call on the order.

Transcript38 turns · Copy

YouLet's stay on the problem for a moment. What do users run into before they give up?

Speaker BThey drop off at step two. That's where they have to pick a department.

YouYes, and we have data on that. So I think we test two variants of that step.

Sprint review with the business Delete
Feedback

Sprint review with the business

24 May · 10.00  ·  4 speakers  ·  English
The report in four lines
Your exerciseDidn't come up today. The practice made no sense in a review without data claims.
Next practiceWhen you say “we have data on that”, then say the source and the number in the same sentence.
Could have done“We'll make it” without a burndown  ·  Demo without a goal
Do againThe team demoed it themselves  ·  The deadline question got an answer
Your exercise

Didn't come up today. The practice made no sense in a review without data claims.

First measurement. You mentioned data once, without a source, so the practice hasn't been tested yet.

When you say “we have data on that”, then say the source and the number in the same sentence.

New after the last meeting. ChangeWrite your ownTurn off
What you could have done2
“We'll make it” without a burndown“We'll make it. There's still some room in the last sprint.”24:30The room left the meeting with five different pictures of where things stand.Instead: “We're 60% through, and we cut X to hit the deadline.”
Demo without a goal“So let's just show the four things we built”02:15Nobody said what the sprint goal was, so the demo became entertainment, not evidence.Instead: “The sprint goal was X. Here is how close we are.”
Do it again2the team demoed it themselves · the deadline question got an answer
The team demoed it themselves“Jonas, will you start with search?”00:40The questions went straight to the people who built it, and Jonas answered details you couldn't have.
The deadline question got an answer“How are we looking on the deadline?”24:10You answered right away instead of parking it. The answer lacked numbers, but it came.
Your focus2Delivery · Leadership
Delivery · Status without numbers“We'll make it” without a burndown left five pictures of status in the room.
Leadership · Demo without a goalFour features were shown without the sprint goal being said out loud.
Next time2

What was cut to hit the deadline, and who decided?

Which sprint goal would have turned the demo into evidence?

Reference

Marty Cagan: a sprint review is evidence of progress toward an outcome, not a showcase of output.

Read more
EssayMarty Cagan: Inspired & EmpoweredCagan's two books on the four product risks (value, usability, viability, feasibility) and how empowered product teams work.EssayPlaybook · Layer 4: Processes & workflowsWhen building is free, decisions become the bottleneck. Layer 4 on processes and workflows: short cycles, frequent reviews and learning in between instead of the big spec in one go.
Background
Summarywhat the meeting was about

A 30-minute review with the team and two people from the business. Four things were demonstrated, and the deadline came up at the end.

Transcript27 turns · Copy

YouLet's run the review. Jonas, will you start with search?

Speaker CHow are we looking on the deadline, now that we've spent two weeks on this?

YouWe'll make it. There's still some room in the last sprint.

Sessions With feedbackAll Newest first ↓ Import

Sessions

2 meetings with feedback. Latest: 27 May, 14.30.
Latest
This week 1
Your progress

Your progress

2 meetings with a verdict
Ask the coach
Recent meetings
MeetingExerciseDiscoveryLeadershipDelivery
Record ⌘R to record Recording
Should Lyt record? Microsoft Teams is using the microphone
Your exercise Say the source and the number out loud in the same sentence, every time you mention data. Recording system audio + microphone
Listening 00:00
The coach is reading the meeting Transcribing … Usually takes 1–2 min
Settings
You
NameMartin
Emailmail@martinibsen.dk
FocusDiscovery · Leadership · Delivery Edit
ContextDictate

B2B SaaS, team of six, I'm new as a PM.

Engine
Lyt's engineRequires Lyt Plus
Own keyAnthropic · sk-ant-••••41a
API keysk-ant-••••41aEdit
Coach feedback
Your exerciseWhen you say “we have data on that”, then say the source and the number in the same sentence. EditReset
Save transcript
Meeting languageDanskEnglish
Meetings
Default audio sourceSystem audio + microphoneMicrophone only
Menu bar iconShows exercise and recording status
Discover meetings
Open at login
Connect
TMicrosoft TeamsConnectedConnected ✓
ZZoomConnect
MGoogle MeetConnect
FFirefliesConnect
GGranolaConnect
FFathomConnect
Account
AccessSubscription activeRestore previous purchases
Account dataDelete from server…

on iPhone, Mac, and in your inbox

Built on

I have boiled everything I know about product leadership, theory and practice, into the app.

  • The theory that matters in product leadership. Ten competencies distilled from decades of product leadership literature.
  • The context you are in. The company, the team and the type of meeting.
  • Your role. Whether you are a head of product, a PO, a UX designer or a manager.
See the Product Leadership Spider Web →
LeadershipCommunicationCoachingMentoringFacilitationProduct VisionProduct StrategyPlanDeliveryDiscovery
A person works at a laptop; Lyt's report from a meeting floats beside the screen.

Keep your note-taker. Lyt is the coach on top.

You do not have to switch tools. Paste the transcript or import the file, and Lyt coaches on top of it.

Built for meetings that must not leak.

Meeting recordings are some of the most confidential material you have. That is why the data flow is as short as it can possibly be.

Read the full privacy policy → Get your own AI key in 2 minutes →

Questions and answers

Can't find the answer? We'll cover it in 20 minutes.

Book a demo
Who is Lyt for?

For people who work in product and spend a lot of time in meetings: product managers, product owners, UX and product designers, Heads of Product and other product leaders. You tell Lyt about your role and pick up to three focus areas, so the feedback fits your work.

What do I get after a meeting?

Three things: how it went with the exercise from last time, one moment from the meeting with what you said and what you could have said instead, and one exercise for your next meeting. Summary, transcript and more moments are folded away below.

What is Lyt built on?

Coaching theory and research on what makes feedback work. That is why you get what you need after a meeting: concrete moments from your own meeting and one thing to practise. Your progress shows, meeting by meeting, whether the exercise worked.

Which meetings does it work for?

Both in-person and video meetings. On Mac and Windows, Lyt also records the computer's audio, so both sides of a meeting in Teams, Zoom or Google Meet are captured. On iPhone, Lyt records the room you are in. A meeting can last up to three hours.

Does a bot join the meeting?

No. Lyt records on your own device, so no extra participant shows up in the meeting.

Do I have to replace my note-taking tool?

No. Lyt is the coach on top. You can paste or import a transcript from Teams, Zoom, Google Meet, Fireflies, Granola or Fathom and get feedback on it.

Do I need my own AI key?

Only if you want one. With your own key, the coaching runs on your own agreement with the AI provider. With Lyt Plus the AI is included, and there is nothing to set up.

What does it cost?

The first 7 days are free. After that DKK 99 a month or DKK 899 a year with your own AI key, or DKK 149 a month or DKK 1,499 a year with Lyt Plus, where the AI is included.

Which languages and devices?

Danish and English, on iPhone, Mac and Windows. You choose the meeting language in the app, and the feedback comes in the same language.

A coach costs DKK 3,000 an hour. Lyt costs from DKK 99 a month.

7 days free.

Download on the App Store Download for Mac Download for Windows

Book a demo, 20 minutes online →

Privacy policy · Terms

Book a demo

20 minutes, online. I show you the app on a real meeting, and you ask the questions you have. No slides.

Pick a time →